Good science, bad science.

Good science: scientist performs and experiment about generating gravity artificially:

http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/scientists_find_evidence_for_artifical_gravity_10282.html

…………….then, in an article, is quoted thus: Tajmar hopes that other physicists will conduct their own versions of the experiment in order to verify the findings and rule out a facility induced effect.

Bad science: Chief global warming advocate is shown that there are minor flaws in some f the data he has been using. Ad hominem attacks galore: http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/08/global_warming_bureaucrat_hans.html

The church of agw marches on………..

btw, it seems that the artificial gravity thing may not turn out to be correct……doesn’t matter though, that’s how you ‘do’ science, put up a theory and then see if it can be knocked down. Unlike the agw crew who cry ‘sceptic’ or ‘denier’ at anyone who dares challenge their conclusions.